What is love… ?

Healing Heart

So, I’ve been going to some talks lately at the Hare Krishna centre near me ~ if you’ve not ever crossed paths with a Hare Krishna then you might know some of their famous followers; George Harrison, Steve Jobs and Russell Brand being amongst them. I wouldn’t class myself as a devotee; but of all the religions that have thus far crossed my path, it’s the one I’ve been the most drawn to… I like that they don’t specify that whatever God figure you perceive to exist (be it Mohammad, Jesus, The Universe and so on), that they don’t deem it necessary for you to call “Him/Her/It”, Krishna; yes, that’s their belief; but they aren’t so egotistical about it that if you don’t follow in the idea of Krishna specifically, then you are in some way damned. Which I kinda like as I’ve never responded well to institutional thinking that’s forced upon me ;-)

And as far as they’re concerned, whether you believe in Krishna or not, he still exists; which I kinda like too.

Anyway tonights talk was about the definition of love… and love has been a longstanding topic of fascination for me… but I don’t know if I’ve ever tried to succinctly, and concretely define it – I guess because I thought the topic was too vast and varied to do so.

It seems even dictionary definitions are varied, but this was my favourite “official” definition:what-is-love

However in the room there were yet more varying opinions on what the definition was;

  • That it is unconditional.
  • That it’s an understanding of the other person.
  • That its knowing the other person deeply.
  • That it’s serving the other person.
  • That it’s putting the other persons needs before your own.
  • That it’s allowing the other person to “be” what they want, even if potentially damaging to them – as to give them space means they will learn and grow at their own pace and through their own experiences.

I’m sure there were probably a few more, but those were the main ones… some similarities, but not all completely in-line with each other. What pretty much everyone in the room could relate to were the giddy feelings of love that are felt at the start of a relationship; that phase where you can only think of the object of your affections – and we had a fairly lengthy discussion on how healthy this phase was… my overall feeling was that it isn’t a phase that’s sustainable; and this is why many relationship these days fail – as they believe that once we’re out of the giddy phase, it must mean the relationship is doomed.

But the Hare Krishna’s believe this state can be permanent ~ but we’re afraid to chase this ideal; it’s fear of it not being attainable and/or permanent that prevents us from achieving it – or even desiring it. Much debating ensued, and it certainly pushed my own beliefs – but what was funny to me was, as, the speaker questioned why we wouldn’t entertain the idea of it being possible, this popped into my head: “because we’re impermanent beings trying to chase a permanent state…” and then about thirty seconds later the speaker said those exact words. Which I guess means something on some level must have been resonating ;-)

The other thing that repeatedly came up / was hotly debated / pushed my belief boundaries, was the idea that love can be continuously unconditional and universal… the unconditional part meaning that in addition to thinking of the “other/s” constantly, that your thoughts are only focused on how you can best be of service to them, with disregard to your own thoughts/needs, and the universal part meaning you can literally feel this way about everyone, all the time.

Now don’t get me wrong; I’m down with universal love; I think the idea of continuously being in that state sounds fabulous… solver of all the worlds problems etc etc. Universal love isn’t a new concept to me, indeed it’s something I strive to attain and work towards ~ but ~ I am also aware that I am “human” – therefore by nature, I will make mistakes and be “imperfect”. Plus I literally don’t know a single person who constantly and consistently achieves a state of continuously, universally emitting unconditional love ~ and I’m fortunate to know some pretty cool, loving, “enlightened” beings. So whilst I think this is a lovely concept to aim to achieve, I don’t know if I’m down with the whole idea that if you’re not achieving that, then you’re not truly connected to love. Which I’m still not 100% clear was the insinuation, by the way… I’ll seek further clarity on this one ;-)

The other thing I just could not wrap my head around, was the speakers suggestion that if you’re not constantly thinking of your said love(s), and constantly seeking ways to better serve them, then it’s not love – it’s deeply caring for them, but it’s not love.

Now, I objected to this for two reasons:

  1. I love my mum deeply; but just this week we had a tiff, where, in the moment I fell out of thinking of her and into thinking of me. It lasted only a few minutes, and took me less than an hour to “get over it” and refocus on her – but it still happened. Does this mean I don’t love my mum? For obvious reasons I have a strong and objective reaction to the suggestion of that.
  2. I love my two cats ~ I mean, these cats must have the best karmic souls ever because they are spoilt  – but am I constantly thinking about them and how I can better serve them? Erm, no – I’m not *that* crazy ;-)
    ~ but I do love them; and, having experienced the sudden death of one about two years ago, and it literally taking me a good year of grieving to recover from her loss, I’m pretty sure I know how deeply my feelings for my furry friends run. So, again, I object quite strongly to the idea that unless they are constantly in my thoughts and I’m constantly thinking how I can better serve them, it means I just care for them deeply… in fact I’ve spent a good portion of the day telling them that I love them today, just in case they sensed what we were discussing!

So I think, for me love isn’t so simple to define; as for me, a simple definition cannot encompass the various facets of love.

The closest I could get to defining it was as more of a feeling, than something you can express with words; it’s an energy exchange, something that connects you to your heart, and motivates you to be a better person. I strive to be universally loving to all who cross my path; but I also accept I have flaws still, and I also have preferences too.

It also occurred to me, amidst this discussion of whether love was universally unconditional; that I’m not sure I’ve had much experience of unconditional love ~ which is possibly where my objection to the idea of it stems from?

Who knows what is the definition of love, or who’s definition is right; it’s such a vast and huuuuge topic that I don’t think it was ever possible for my monkey brain to have reached a satisfactory conclusion last night! Either way it’s certainly given me something to mull over – and I’m looking forward to exploring the topic further… (it was the first of three talks).

And with that, what do you think? Is love unconditional? Is it possible to be equally and continuously loving to all souls? Or are we too “human” for that? As always, I would love to hear your thoughts my sweet peeps… and will let you know how the next talk unfolds! xo

PS – one thing I am sure of, is the huge healing powers of love; both giving and receiving ~ and it’s funny this talk should come at a time when I’ve been working with this Kathryn Budig meditation on YogaGlo; which has been having a pretty powerful effect on me, so I wanted to share it with you…. the site is a subscription one, but I’m pretty sure you can do preview, as well as sign up for a two week free trial… try it, it’s wonderful and will make your heart sing ♥


8 thoughts on “What is love… ?

  1. I like this post. Is it possible that our definition of love has been watered down? Pure spring water and recycled sewer water springs to mind. Both are water, both quench our thirst but one is pure and the other is manufactured. Real true love would need no discussion, the very fact that we are trying to define it means we can’t have truly experienced it. I don’t know if that makes any sense. I do find it very interesting.

    • Hmmm… that is a very interesting slant… and now my monkey brain will go off onto another trail…!

      As I mentioned in my post, I am inclined to think it’s an energy, or experiential, rather than definable by words; so you may be onto something… So I shall mull on this now too… And I love hearing other people’s takes on this stuff, so thanks for commenting! And do share anything else that springs to mind… :)

  2. yep it’s definitely a feeling and an exchange of energy, I’m sure that people who are close are vibrating at the same frequency or synchronise to the same frequency, that’s why it feels so comfortable and they seem to merge into one, can sense each other at a distance, even before they meet etc. If we placed our relationships on a continuum of closeness, I suppose it would be bell curve shaped, with a few special, loving relationships at the top end, with people “in sync” with us? Also I’ve noticed that love can make people feel uncomfortable, if a couple bicker in public then it’s often not noticed but show affection in a normal social setting and you’ll often draw disapproving looks. It’s as if love intimidates people, which I suppose is understandable as it can be so powerful. Another thing I’ve noticed is that if you are with someone you love, in public, you seem to draw a lot of attention, even if you are just talking or walking down the street, it’s as if there is an energy or aura that other people sense. I reckon that’s one of the ways great performers hold an audience, they radiate a love of their craft and their life that is just mesmerising.

    • Ah, I really like some of your observations Dave! You’re so right; couples in love do always have amazing energy around them! They always make me smile :)

      And so true too that any talk that’s really stayed with me is probably owing feeling and enjoying the feeling of love that they radiate for whatever they are sharing… lovely.

      Thank you for sharing your thoughts with me :)

  3. Hi there,
    I’m 14 and was diagnosed type 1 in June. On insulin and now HGH. Did you dodge the insulin and if so how? I was cured of Lyme thru energy healing, but hasn’t changed the type 1. Any advice?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s